Third Post

The cartoon is an acknowledgment of the subjective nature of the Supreme Court. It is commentary on the inefficiency of having such a system. The prime example of this is the determination in the Dred Scott case. It determined that black people were not, in fact, citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. This was decided in 1857 by a 7-2 decision. Less than 10 years later, the decision was overturned by the 13th Amendment. It is an example of the sentiment discussed in the political cartoon - subjectivity and human error makes justice difficult to come by.

Second Post

The Supreme Court derives its power first and foremost from the Constitution, as that is the document that originally forged its' existence. As the years went on, the Court saw its power expand to judicial review with Marbury v. Madison, as well as review of state laws with Martin v. Hunter's Lessee. The supreme court currently involves disputes between two states, the US and a state, a state and a different state's citizen, or foreign ambassadors. It also now works as an appellate court in addition to its' original power. The supreme court hears cases from the Court of Appeals, Court of Military Appeals, or State Courts if they involve federal issues. All these powers stem from the Court's ability to conduct review and help the Constitution evolve as a living document.

First Post

Kevin: I have never blogged and will probably fail this section for lack of aptitude interneting. I like notebooks better, but you are the teacher so its blog time.